Massachusetts is leading the way when it comes to building energy code, but it’s not alone. California, Connecticut, and a number of other states have or will be enacting increasingly progressive codes. This means that even if you don’t live in one of these places, you might be interested in knowing where energy code is going next. Here’s a crash course on the ins and outs of Massachusetts energy code.  

To evaluate the efficiency of an entire house, you need a standardized grading method. In Massachusetts, compliance with stretch code is evaluated based on a HERS/ERI score. HERS stands for home energy rating system, and it was developed for this purpose by Resnet, a nonprofit organization. It provides a score on a linear scale drawn between zero and 100. A score of zero is a net-zero house — or a house that generates, through a renewable energy source, as much energy as it uses — and a score of 100 represents efficiency compliant to the 2006 IECC, the newest model code at the time of the HERS creation.

The HERS system is continually reviewed and updated, but the scoring system remains on a scale based on the 2006 IECC. For many years, this energy rating method was useful for tax credits and consumer confidence but was not a method of government energy code compliance. That changed in the 2015 edition of the IECC when the Energy Rating Index (ERI) was added as a method of compliance.

Let’s start with UA. The total UA of the building is calculated by summing the individual U-Factors (thermal performance) of each component of a building assembly weighed by the area of that assembly compared to the area of the entire thermal envelope. 

TC is calculated by the same U-Factor x Area (UA) calculation for the building assembly, but it adds in the slab F-Factor x slab perimeter (ft).